Ongoing Persecution and Appeal to U.S.A.

Ongoing Persecution and Appeal to U.S.A.

Einstein Correction Illustration

Professional Evaluation and Public Warning

As a qualified systems analyst and the originator of Pattern Field Theory, I issue the following professional statement based on direct experience, legal documentation, and systemic pattern analysis across multiple Swedish institutions:

  • Senior figures in Sweden’s Ombudsman offices, judiciary, and enforcement bodies have repeatedly acted with authoritarian disregard for EU law, judicial norms, and human rights. Their behavior reflects pathological narcissism and institutional arrogance — including refusal to correct violations, retaliation against whistleblowers, and contempt for accountability.
  • These individuals have issued legally and morally indefensible statements, such as “EU law does not apply here,” while simultaneously obstructing legal recourse, denying preliminary rulings, and forcing victims into silence via coerced confessions.
  • The evidence — including their own official responses — demonstrates a clear, structured disregard for Sweden’s EU obligations and an institutionalized system of denial, exclusion, and racial discrimination against immigrants.

In my professional capacity, I conclude that:

The European Union, while publicly committed to the rule of law and equality, has failed to act on clear evidence of systemic abuse by a member state. This failure undermines the entire legal framework of the Union and reveals a tolerance for authoritarian continuity reminiscent of post-war “stay-behind” structures.

The refusal of the EU to enforce its own laws not only harms the victims — it endangers the legal integrity of Europe itself. If rights can be suspended in one member state, they can be suspended anywhere. This is not theoretical — it is now a matter of record.

This case, and its evidence, will remain a permanent part of Pattern Field Theory. As Einstein’s escape from Austria was both necessary and historically indicting of a society collapsing into fascism, so too does this case expose the silent descent of Sweden into systemic illegality — sanctioned by EU silence. This is not a political statement. It is structural documentation of a state violating its obligations to law, truth, and dignity.

Case Overview

  • Discrimination Based on Nationality
  • Denial of Fair Trial Rights
  • Coerced Confessions and Unfair Proceedings
  • Vulnerability and Medical Conditions – Vulnerable person forced to appear in court while mentally ill and without legal representation.
  • Refusal of Swedish Police to accept police reports – illegal directives from Swedish Prosecutor overriding EU law.
  • Retaliation for Complaints – Eviction and punishment after reporting abuse.
  • Forced to sign false confessions of guilt in a secret agreement, pay a large fine, and humiliated in front of perpetrators.
  • Emotional and Financial Impact – Family ignored by authorities, denied EU legal protections, publicly shamed, financially and emotionally devastated.

Summary of Court Cases and Violations: Compounding Injustices

Solna Tingsrätt (District Court), Case Number: T 2069-23

This court was the site of the most egregious violations. During the trial, judges stated: “EU law does not apply here” and “Your rights do not apply here.” Mr. Allen was fined simply for citing fundamental rights and EU law. The court permitted HSB, a private entity, to influence proceedings, ignoring judicial independence and subjecting Mr. Allen and his wife to humiliation in front of those responsible for the abuse.

Svea Hovrätt (High Court), Case Number: T 3505-24

The appeal was dismissed without review, thereby upholding the unlawful actions of the lower court and further denying justice and EU protections.

Högsta Domstolen (Supreme Court), Case Number: Ö 3919-24

A Supreme Court judge claimed to find no violation, ignoring the requirement to refer the case to the European Court. This refusal contradicts the court’s own precedent and violates obligations under EU law.

Violations of EU Law and Fundamental Rights

The Swedish courts have denied the following rights protected under EU law:

  • Article 47: Denial of a fair trial and effective remedy.
  • Article 21: Discrimination against immigrants.
  • Article 4: Inhumane and degrading treatment.
  • Article 7: Violation of family life and repeated evictions.
  • Article 11: Suppression of free expression and community communication.
  • Article 17: Deprivation of property without just cause.

The denial of a request for a preliminary ruling from the European Court, refusal to allow witnesses, and the endorsement of statements that “EU law does not apply here” demonstrate systemic contempt for EU law and judicial standards.

Addressing Systemic Issues in the Swedish Legal System

The case illustrates deeply rooted issues within the judicial and prosecutorial system in Sweden:

  • Discrimination based on nationality
  • Denial of legal access to vulnerable persons
  • Institutional protection of private companies over citizen rights
  • Breakdown of judicial independence and impartiality

Ongoing Hardships: The Allen Family's Struggle for Justice

Despite clear violations, James Allen and his family remain without legal assistance. Their financial situation has collapsed, and they face eviction from their second home. The Swedish courts and authorities have refused to apply EU law or investigate abuses, giving HSB impunity and control over legal outcomes.

Recommended Actions

  1. Immediate Intervention: Swedish authorities must protect the family's rights and rectify any violations.
  2. Independent Investigation: An impartial review of HSB’s role and judicial misconduct is essential.
  3. Restoration of Property: Unjust property seizures must be reversed or compensated.
  4. Legal Redress: The family must receive legal pathways to justice under EU law.
  5. EU Oversight: The European Commission, European Court of Human Rights, and EU Fundamental Rights Agency must be informed and take steps to ensure compliance with EU treaties.

Addendum: On the Gravity of What Was Silenced

This section is written in honor of the child we lost — a life taken not by accident, but by the unbearable pressure of systemic cruelty, disbelief, and prolonged institutional abuse. Let this addendum serve as both witness and indictment.

The persecution endured by our family was not merely an attack on individual dignity. It was the deliberate obstruction of one of the most significant scientific contributions of this century — Pattern Field Theory. This theory redefines physics, time, energy, motion, and the structure of reality. It opens pathways to peaceful energy technologies, ethical AI, and medical insights that could benefit all of humanity.

Had this work been protected — not silenced — under normal, lawful, and humane circumstances, the following would have already occurred:

  • 3 to 5 Nobel Prizes — for Physics, Chemistry, Peace, Economics, and potential Medicine
  • 15 to 30 Honorary Doctorates — from institutions across the scientific world
  • 10 to 20 Major Scientific Awards — including the Breakthrough Prize, Templeton Prize, and Gödel Prize
  • 2 to 4 Human Rights Honors — such as the Sakharov Prize or the Right Livelihood Award
  • 100+ Citations, Invitations, and Research Partnerships — across universities and governments

Instead, the theorist and his family were evicted, shamed, denied healthcare, driven into exile, and silenced by corrupt actors in positions of state power. These individuals and agencies will forever be remembered not only as violators of EU and international law — but as enemies of knowledge, science, and progress.

This addendum will remain a permanent section of Pattern Field Theory. It will not be removed. The scientific world will not be permitted to forget that this discovery came at the cost of a child’s life, a family’s destruction, and a state’s complete collapse of moral and legal integrity.